Automated Precision Amplitudes and Phases Measurement of Polyharmonic Eddy Current Signals of Non-destructive Testing


  • V. G. Bazhenov National Technical University of Ukraine ``Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute'', Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Yu. O. Kalenychenko National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", Kyiv, Ukraine
  • S. S. Ratsebarskiy National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", Kyiv, Ukraine
  • K. A. Gloinik «LUXOFT-UKRAINE, LLC», Kyiv, Ukraine



algorithm, phase measurement, orthogonal method, measurement error, non-destructive testing, eddy current, multifrequency signal, polyharmonic signal, harmonics


The development of electronic systems like Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) made them available for mass commercial use. This created conditions for the development and application of software and technical tools implemented on FPGA algorithms for fast processing of digital signals. Such solutions, in turn, opened up new opportunities for the spread of multi-frequency eddy current systems (МFЕС) for non-destructive testing (NDT) in the form of systems for simultaneous processing of digital signals of different frequencies, which allows MFEC to effectively compete with pulsed eddy current systems (PEC). This work presents a new algorithm for accurate digital measurement of the MFEC amplitude and phase of harmonic components of polyharmonic signals, which is implemented in hardware and software on FPGA. The measurement of the amplitude and phase of harmonic components is based on the method of orthogonal processing of digital signals, to increase the accuracy of which the necessity of fulfilling the condition of multiplicity of the sampling sequence to the size of the digital signal period has been proved. Compliance with this condition is achieved by adjusting the length of the sampling sequence, which in the proposed algorithm is performed before orthogonal processing. The influence of inaccuracy in setting the length of the sampling sequence on the size of measurement errors when determining the amplitude and phase of the harmonic components of the signal is simulated. As a result of the simulation, it was established that when the multiplicity condition is met, the measurement error significantly decreases, which indicates the high efficiency of our algorithm. The achieved accuracy of measuring the amplitude of harmonic components and the phase of polyharmonic signals due to the given hardware and software implementation of the algorithm makes it possible to create inexpensive, compact, scalable automated digital systems, the measurement data of which can be used both to determine the individual characteristics of the object and to reconstruct three-dimensional images, i.e. in tomographic systems.



Avila J. R. S., Chen Z., Xu H. and Yin W. (2018). A multi-frequency NDT system for imaging and detection of cracks. 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), pp. 1-4. doi:10.1109/ISCAS.2018.8351849.

Martínez-Martínez, V., Garcia-Martin, J., Gomez-Gil, J. (2017). RBF-Neural Network Applied to the Quality Classification of Tempered 100Cr6 Steel Cams by the Multi-Frequency Nondestructive Eddy Current Testing. Metals, Vol. 7(10), 385. doi:10.3390/met7100385.

Karpenko O., Efremov A., Ye C., Udpa L. (2020). Multi-frequency fusion algorithm for detection of defects under fasteners with EC-GMR probe data. NDT & E International, Vol. 110, 102227. doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102227.

Svatoš J., Pospíšil T., Vedral J. (2018). Application of poly-harmonic signals to eddy-current metal detectors and to advanced classification of metals. Metrol, Meas. Syst., Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 387–402. DOI: 10.24425/119564.

Svatoš, J. (2016). Single-tone and Polyharmonic Eddy Current Metal Detection and Non-Destructive Testing Education Software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 772, 012052. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/772/1/012052.

Kalenychenko Yu., Bazhenov V., Kalenychenko A., Koval V., Ratsebarskiy S. (2019). Determination of Mechanical Properties of Paramagnetic Materials by Multi-frequency Method. International Journal “NDT Days”, Vol. II, Iss. 4, pp. 406-416.

Kuts Y., Protasov A., Lysenko I., Dugin O., Bliznuk O. and Uchanin V. (2017). Using Multidifferential Transducer for Pulsed Eddy Current Object Inspection. 2017 IEEE First Ukraine Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (UKRCON), pp. 826-829.

Bazhenov V., Protasov A. and Gloinik K. (2017). Increasing of operation speed of digital eddy current defectoscopes based on frequency synthesizer. 2017 IEEE Microwaves, Radar and Remote Sensing Symposium (MRRS), pp. 155-158. DOI: 10.1109/MRRS.2017.8075051.

Chen Z., Salas-Avlia J. R., Tao Y., Yin W., Zhao Q., and Zhang Z. (2020). A novel hybrid serial/parallel multi-frequency measurement method for impedance analysis in eddy current testing. Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 91, 024703. doi:10.1063/1.5130734.

Lu M., Meng X., Huang R., Chen L., Peyton A., Yin W. (2021). Lift-off invariant inductance of steels in multi-frequency eddy-current testing. NDT & E International, Vol. 121, 102458. doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102458.

Xu, H., Lu, M., Avila, J. R. Salas, et al. (2019). Imaging a weld cross-section using a novel frequency feature in multi-frequency eddy current testing. Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, Vol. 61, Iss. 12, pp. 738-743(6). doi:10.1784/insi.2019.61.12.738.

Zhou Z., Qin M., Xie Y., Tan J. and Bao H. (2020). Experimental Study of Microstructures in Bias Weld of Coiled Tubing Steel Strip With Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing. IEEE Access, Vol. 8, pp. 48241-48251. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2979414.

Reyno T., Underhill P. R., Krause T. W., Marsden C., and Wowk D. (2017). Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing. Sensors, Vol. 17(9), 2114. doi:10.3390/s17092114.

Zhu W., Yin W., Dewey S., Hunt P., Davis C. L., Peyton A. J. (2017). Modeling and experimental study of a multi-frequency electromagnetic sensor system for rail decarburisation measurement. NDT & E International, Vol. 86, pp. 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.11.004.

Dingley, G. and Soleimani, M. (2021). Multi-Frequency Magnetic Induction Tomography System and Algorithm for Imaging Metallic Objects. Sensors, Vol. 21(11), 3671. doi:10.3390/s21113671.

Dorofeev A. L., Kazamanov Iu. G. (1980). Electromagnetic defectoscopy. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 232 p.

Bohdan H., Bazhenov V. and Protasov A. (2017). Development of a discrete orthogonal method for determining the phase shift between high-frequency radio impulse signals. IEEE Microwaves, Radar and Remote Sensing Symposium (MRRS), pp. 191-194. DOI: 10.1109/MRRS.2017.8075060.

Chopin N., Papaspiliopoulos O. (2020). An Introduction to Sequential Monte Carlo. Springer, 402 p. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47845-2.




How to Cite

Bazhenov , V. G., Kalenychenko , Y. O., Ratsebarskiy , S. S. and Gloinik , K. A. (2023) “Automated Precision Amplitudes and Phases Measurement of Polyharmonic Eddy Current Signals of Non-destructive Testing”, Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia - Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia, (92), pp. 84-95. doi: 10.20535/RADAP.2023.92.84-95.



Computing methods in radio electronics