Algorithm for Spatial Control of Swarm of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Leader Based on Synergistic Approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/RADAP.2025.100.%25p

Keywords:

synergistic approach, swarm, unmanned aerial vehicle, leader, control algorithm, attraction/repulsion potential, modeling

Abstract

Formulation of the problem in general. It is noted that it is advisable to use unmanned aerial vehicles as part of swarms (groups) to perform tasks in a complex environment with obstacles in an automatic or remote-controlled mode, which requires algorithmisation of the process of building routes. It is shown that the problematic aspects of UAV swarm control are their coordination to perform a single task, ensuring the reliability and stability of communication, and avoiding complex static and dynamic obstacles along the flight route.
    
Analysis of recent researches and publications. The paper analyses models and algorithms for building routes, in particular those that use a synergistic approach based on the known location of all other swarm elements. However, this approach is considered only theoretically and with a typical example for movement in a two-dimensional plane.
    
Presenting the main material. An improved control algorithm based on a synergistic approach for three-dimensional space in the presence of a leader is proposed, which reduces the computational complexity and calculation time. An expression is presented that formalises the mathematical model for determining the acceleration of an unmanned aerial vehicle from a group (swarm) consisting of N elements. It is shown that in order to implement an improved algorithm for route construction and group control, the location of the driven elements of the group should be determined relative to the route positions of its leader. The implementation of the algorithm has been tested by mathematical modelling in the Ardupilot SITL environment and by conducting a full-scale (flight) experiment using a group (swarm) of three UAVs of the copter type. 
    
Conclusion. The proposed algorithm for spatial control of a UAV swarm with a leader based on a synergistic approach allows keeping the group elements in space within the target optimal distance between them. The simulation and practical experiment confirmed the ability of the algorithm to provide a linear process of increasing the number of iterations to reach the critical distance, unlike the prototype, for which this indicator increased quadratically.
    
The perspectives of future researches. Further research should include the development of a methodology for constructing routes for collision-free movement of groups (swarms) of UAVs based on the proposed algorithm.

References

References

1. Ann S., Kim Y., Ahn J. (2015). Area Allocation Algorithm for Multiple UAVs Area Coverage Based on Clustering and Graph Method. IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol. 48, Iss. 9, pp. 204–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.08.084.

2. Chandran I., Vipin K. (2024). Multi-UAV Networks for Disaster Monitoring: Challenges and Opportunities from a Network Perspective. Drone Systems and Applications, Vol. 12, pp. 1–28, DOI:10.1139/dsa-2023-0079.

3. Ariante G., Ponte S., Papa U., Greco A., Del Core G. (2022). Ground Control System for UAS Safe Landing Area Determination (SLAD) in Urban Air Mobility Operations. Sensors, Vol. 22, Iss. 9:3226. DOI: 10.3390/s22093226.

4. Chepizhenko V., Pavlova S., Pisarchuk A., Zakharin F., Ponomarenko S. (eds. by V. Chepizhenko). (2018). Navigatsiya i upravlenie slozhnimi dinamicheskimi sistemami [Navigation and control of complex dynamic systems]. Kiev: Natsionalnii aviatsionnii universitet, 166 s. / LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 176 p.

5. Poghosyan S., Poghosyan V., Abrahamyan S., Lazyan A., Astsatryan H., Alaverdyan Y., Eguiazarian K. (2024). Cloud-based mathematical models for self-organizing swarms of UAVs: design and analysis. Drone Systems and Applications, Vol. 12, pp. 1–12. DOI:10.1139/dsa-2023-0039.

6. Tang J., Liang Y., Li K. (2024). Dynamic Scene Path Planning of UAVs Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning. Drones, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, 60, pp. 1–21. DOI: 10.3390/drones8020060.

7. Marek D., Paszkuta M., Szyguła J., Biernacki P., Domanski A., Szczygieł M., Król M., Wojciechowski K. (2024). Swarm of Drones in a Simulation Environment – Efficiency and Adaptation. Applied Sciences, Vol. 14, Iss. 9, 3703. DOI: 10.3390/app14093703.

8. Phadke A., Medrano F. A., Sekharan Ch. N., Chu T. (2024). An Analysis of Trends in UAV Swarm Implementations in Current Research: Simulation Versus Hardware. Drone Systems and Applications, Vol. 12, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1139/dsa-2023-0099.

9. Campion M., Ranganathan Pr., Faruque S. (2019). UAV Swarm Communication and Control Architectures: A review. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems, Vol. 7(2), pp. 93–106. DOI: 10.1139/juvs-2018-0009.

10. Hu J., Liu K. (2020) Raft consensus mechanism and the applications. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 5th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing (ICSP), Vol. 1544, pp. 1–18. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1544/1/012079.

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Telecommunication, navigation, radar systems, radiooptics and electroacoustics

How to Cite

“Algorithm for Spatial Control of Swarm of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Leader Based on Synergistic Approach” (2025) Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia - Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia, (100), pp. 43–50. doi:10.20535/RADAP.2025.100.%p.