Improving EMG Signal Classification with Transfer Learning Under Low-Data and Cross-Subject Conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64915/RADAP.2025.102.%25pKeywords:
surface electromyography (sEMG), gesture recognition, deep learning, convolutional neural networks (CNN), transfer learning, inter-subject variability, model generalization, fine-tuning strategies, subject adaptation, myoelectric control, EMG-based interface, cross-validation, biomedical signal processing, rehabilitation technologies, low-effort calibrationAbstract
Surface electromyography is a non-invasive method used for monitoring muscle activity and is widely applied in rehabilitation, prosthetics, assistive robotics, and human–computer interaction. However, its practical use often remains limited by large differences between individuals and the effort required to train models for each new user. This study explores whether transfer learning can help address these challenges when using deep learning to classify hand and wrist gestures. The experiments use a dataset that includes eleven gestures, each repeated eight times by 22 healthy participants. Three training approaches are evaluated: (i) training and testing on the same subject (intra-subject), (ii) training on some subjects and testing on a new one (inter-subject), and (iii) transfer learning with and without resetting the fully connected output layer of the convolutional neural network. All models are evaluated using a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy across both subjects and repetitions.
Results show that both transfer learning methods outperform the other two approaches in terms of classification accuracy. The best performance is observed when the fully connected layer is reset before fine-tuning (F1-score = 0.907, σ = 0.074). Wilcoxon signed-rank statistical tests confirm that these improvements are statistically significant, even when only a few repetitions are used for fine-tuning. In fact, using transfer learning with just four repetitions instead of eight achieves accuracy comparable to training from scratch on all eight repetitions.
These findings suggest that fine-tuning pre-trained models can significantly reduce the effort needed to adapt EMG-based systems to new users, providing a practical and effective approach for developing user-friendly interfaces suited to assistive and rehabilitation applications.
References
1. Mohan, D.C. and R, Y.R. (2026) Cloud-Based IoT and AWS Architecture for Real-Time Cardiovascular Patient Monitoring. SSRG International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 281-290, DOI: 10.14445/23488549/IJECE-V13I2P121
2. K. Nguyen, H., and V. Pham, M. (2026) An edge AIoT system for non-invasive biological indicators estimation and continuous health monitoring using PPG and ECG signals. International Journal of Reconfigurable and Embedded Systems (IJRES). Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 97-108, DOI: 10.11591/ijres.v15.i1.pp97-108
3. Neri, L., Oberdier, M. T., van Abeelen, K. C. J., Menghini, L., Tumarkin, E., Tripathi, H., Jaipalli, S., Orro, A., Paolocci, N., Gallelli, I., Dall'Olio, M., Beker, A., Carrick, R. T., Borghi, C. and Halperin, H. R. (2023) Electrocardiogram Monitoring Wearable Devices and Artificial-Intelligence-Enabled Diagnostic Capabilities: A Review. Sensors, 23(10), 4805. DOI: 10.3390/s23104805
4. Jingye Xu and Yuntong Zhang and Wei Wang and Mimi Xie and Dakai Zhu (2025) A Comprehensive PPG-based Dataset for HR/HRV Studies. arXiv, eprint 2505.18165
5. Baigutanova, A., Park, S., Constantinides, M. et al. (2025) A continuous real-world dataset comprising wearable-based heart rate variability alongside sleep diaries. Sci Data 12, 1474. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-05801-3
6. Tasmurzayev, N., Amangeldy, B., Imankulov, T., Imanbek, B., Postolache, O. A. and Konysbekova, A. (2025) A Wearable IoT-Based Measurement System for Real-Time Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Using Heart Rate Variability. Eng, 6(10), 259. DOI: 10.3390/eng6100259
7. Kim, K. B. and Baek, H. J. (2023) Photoplethysmography in wearable devices: a comprehensive review of technological advances, current challenges, and future directions. Electronics 12, 2923, DOI: 10.3390/electronics12132923
8. Baigutanova, A., Park, S., Lee, S. W. and Cha, M. (2023) End-to-end system based on wearable devices for measuring HRV and its potential as an insomnia indicator. J. Korea Inst. Inf. Sci. Pract., 29, 403-409. DOI: 10.5626/KTCP.2023.29.9.403
9. S. M. R. Islam, D. Kwak, M. H. Kabir, M. Hossain and K. -S. Kwak (2015) The Internet of Things for Health Care: A Comprehensive Survey, IEEE Access, vol. 3, pp. 678-708, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2437951
10. Li, Z., Xiao, H., Xia, Z., Zhou, F., Huang, X. and Liu, T. (2025) Three-Branch Network for Multi-Scale Spatiotemporal Feature Fusion in Remote Physiological Measurement. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 71, 10270-10282. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5113756
11. Ali, I. (2021) Data Collection in Studies on Internet of Things (IoT), Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), and Sensor Cloud (SC): Similarities and Differences. IEEE Access, 10, 33909-33931. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3161929
12. Hercog, D., Lerher, T., Truntič, M. and Težak, O. (2023) Design and Implementation of ESP32-Based IoT Devices. Sensors, 23(15), 6739. DOI: 10.3390/s23156739
13. A. Tazarv, S. Labbaf, A. Rahmani, N. Dutt and M. Levorato (2023) Active Reinforcement Learning for Personalized Stress Monitoring in Everyday Settings, 2023 IEEE/ACM Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE), pp. 44-55, DOI: 10.1145/3580252.3586979.
14. Aqajari, S.A., Wang, Z., Tazarv, A., Labbaf, S., Jafarlou, S., Nguyen, B., Dutt, N.D., Levorato, M., and Rahmani, A.M. (2024) Enhancing Performance and User Engagement in Everyday Stress Monitoring: A Context-Aware Active Reinforcement Learning Approach. ArXiv, eprint 2407.08215. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.08215
15. Yali Zheng and Chen Wu and Peizheng Cai and Zhiqiang Zhong and Hongda Huang and Yuqi Jiang (2023) Tiny-PPG: A Lightweight Deep Neural Network for Real-Time Detection of Motion Artifacts in Photoplethysmogram Signals on Edge Devices, arXiv, eprint 2305.03308. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.03308
16. Moraes, J. L., Rocha, M. X., Vasconcelos, G. G., Vasconcelos Filho, J. E., De Albuquerque, V. H. C. and Alexandria, A. R. (2018) Advances in Photopletysmography Signal Analysis for Biomedical Applications. Sensors, 18(6), 1894. DOI: 10.3390/s18061894
17. Mehrgardt, P., Khushi, M., Poon, S. and Withana, A. (2022) Pulse Transit Time PPG Dataset (version 1.1.0). PhysioNet. RRID:SCR_007345. DOI: 10.13026/jpan-6n92
18. Pimentel, M.A.F. et al. (2016) Towards a Robust Estimation of Respiratory Rate from Pulse Oximeters. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 64(8), pp.1914-1923. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2613124
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Б. Ю. Коломієць, Є. С. Карплюк

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).