Mathematical Model of a Radiobeam Detection System Signal

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64915/RADAP.2025.102.%25p

Keywords:

detection, radiobeam, perimeter security means, mathematical model

Abstract

This paper presents the development of a mathematical model of the information signal of a radiobeam detection system for studying the factors influencing its parameters. The model is based on the Huygens–Fresnel principle. The intruder is represented by an equivalent rectangle, which sequentially occludes certain regions of the wave phase front during movement. The information signal is defined as the normalized difference between the field strength in the absence of the intruder model and the field strength in its presence and motion. The mathematical model of the information signal was verified by physical simulation at a frequency of 9.3 GHz using a R2-61 panoramic VSWR meter, standard horn antennas, and metal plates of various sizes that were moved across the detection zone.

The model demonstrated good agreement with experimental data, allowing its application for predicting the waveform of information signals. A series of computational experiments was performed for frequencies of 10.5 GHz, 5.8 GHz, 2.5 GHz, and 1.0 GHz for a 50 m security perimeter. Three intruder movement scenarios were analyzed: upright, bent over, and crawling. It was shown that at higher frequencies (10.5 GHz), the signal during crawling exhibits a positive increment, creating a risk of undetected intruder crossing in systems configured to trigger on negative increments. Lowering the frequency to 5.8 GHz and 2.5 GHz provides more stable negative increments at slightly reduced signal amplitude. At 1.0 GHz, a significant reduction in the signal level is observed. The proposed mathematical model of the information signal accounts for the operating frequency, antenna spacing, intruder geometry, its position, and movement method. This makes it possible to create a database of signals for a specific security perimeter, enabling the use of correlation-based signal processing methods. The obtained results allow selecting the optimal frequency range for a given security perimeter, reducing the volume of experimental testing on a security perimeter, and improving information signal processing algorithms, which will enhance detection reliability and reduce the number of false alarms.

References

References

1. Yevseiev, S., Melenti, Y., Voitko, O., Hrebeniuk, V., Korchenko, A., et al. (2021). Development of a concept for building a critical infrastructure facilities security system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, Vol. 3, No. 9(111), pp. 63–83. DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2021.233533.

2. Armstrong D. and Peile C. (2005). Perimeter intruder detection systems performance standard. Proceedings 39th Annual 2005 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, pp. 33-36. DOI: 10.1109/CCST.2005.1594845.

3. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate. (2025, April 10). Perimeter intrusion detection sensors., date of access: 8 August 2025.

4. 100 m Microwave Bistatic Sensor FMW-100 – Forteza. Ornicom, date of access: 10 August 2025.

5. 500 m Microwave Bistatic Sensor FORTEZA-500 – Forteza. Ornicom, date of access: 10 August 2025.

6. Gong, X., Zhang, J. and Cochran, D. (2012). A Coverage Theory of Bistatic Radar Networks: Worst-Case Intrusion Path and Optimal Deployment. arXiv, 11(19), 3080. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1206.1355.

7. Xu, X., Zhao, C., Ye, T. and Gu, T. (2019). Minimum Cost Deployment of Bistatic Radar Sensor for Perimeter Barrier Coverage. Sensors, Vol. 19, Iss. 2, Article 225. DOI: 10.3390/s19020225.

8. Redpath, G. (2016, May). Reducing perimeter false alarms. SMART Security Solutions, date of access: 12 August 2025.

9. Blacksmith P., Poirier J. L. and Holt F. S. (1979). Radar intrusion detection system. U.S. Patent No. 4,132,988A. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

10. Ludlow, P., Redpath, G. and Seawright, S. (2016). Bidirectional bistatic radar perimeter intrusion detection system (U.S. Patent Application No. US20160178741A1). United States Patent and Trademark Office.

11. Griffiths, D. J. (2023). Introduction to Electrodynamics (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press, 602 р.

12. Kakani, S. L. (2020). Electrodynamics: Classical and Quantum. CBS Publishers and Distributors, 944 р.

13. Willis, N. J. (2005). Bistatic Radar, (2nd ed.). IET, 337 р.

14. Tekinerdogan, B., Özcan, K., Yağız, S. and Yakın, İ. (2021). Feature-Driven Survey of Physical Protection Systems. arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2104.00949.

15. Tripathi, D., Tripathi, A. K., Singh, L. K., Chaturvedi, A. (2022). Towards analyzing the impact of intrusion prevention and response on cyber-physical system availability: A case study of NPP. Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 168, 108863. DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108863.

16. Villegas-Ch, W. and García-Ortiz, J. (2023). Authentication, access, and monitoring system for critical areas with the use of artificial intelligence integrated into perimeter security in a data center. Frontiers in Big Data, Vol. 6, Article 1200390. DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1200390.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Electrodynamics. Microwave devices. Antennas

How to Cite

“Mathematical Model of a Radiobeam Detection System Signal” (2025) Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia - Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia, (102), pp. 5–14. doi:10.64915/RADAP.2025.102.%p.

Most read articles by the same author(s)